Cannot ban user when they have comments replied by others #1133

Closed
opened 2023-01-05 16:48:04 +00:00 by KitaitiMakoto · 3 comments

Should their comments be deleted? or, remain without user?

Should their comments be deleted? or, remain without user?
KitaitiMakoto changed title from Cannot ban user when they have comments in response to others to Cannot ban user when they have comments replied by others 2023-01-05 16:54:35 +00:00
KitaitiMakoto added this to the 0.8.0 milestone 2023-01-05 16:57:13 +00:00
Author
Owner

Good way is to

  • define "resined(banned) user", and
  • replace the comments's author with the user.

or,

  • set the user's state to "banned",
  • prevent the user form login, and
  • show as "resined user" in comment tree.
Good way is to * define "resined(banned) user", and * replace the comments's author with the user. or, * set the user's state to "banned", * prevent the user form login, and * show as "resined user" in comment tree.

I think they should be replaced by a comment owned by no-one saying something along the line of "this comment has been deleted".
Deleting the comment would make the thread ininteligible. Keeping the comment without the user defeat the purpose of banning someone

I think they should be replaced by a comment owned by no-one saying something along the line of "this comment has been deleted". Deleting the comment would make the thread ininteligible. Keeping the comment without the user defeat the purpose of banning someone
Author
Owner

@trinity-1686a
"this comment has been deleted" makes sense. Keep going!

@trinity-1686a "this comment has been deleted" makes sense. Keep going!
trinity-1686a self-assigned this 2023-03-12 13:20:08 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Plume/Plume#1133
No description provided.