Use Rust for the front-end too #374
无评审员
标签
未选择标签
A: API
A: Backend
A: Federation
A: Front-End
A: I18N
A: Meta
A: Security
Build
C: Bug
C: Discussion
C: Enhancement
C: Feature
Compatibility
Dependency
Design
Documentation
Good first issue
Help welcome
Mobile
Rendering
S: Blocked
S: Duplicate
S: Incomplete
S: Instance specific
S: Invalid
S: Needs Voting/Discussion
S: Ready for review
Suggestion
S: Voted on Loomio
S: Wontfix
未选择里程碑
暂无项目
未指派成员
2 位参与者
通知
到期时间
未设置到期时间。
依赖工单
没有设置依赖项。
引用:Plume/Plume#374
正在加载…
添加表格
在新工单中引用
没有提供说明。
删除分支 "wasm"
删除分支是永久的。虽然已删除的分支在实际被删除前有可能会短时间存在,但这在大多数情况下无法撤销。是否继续?
Rust can compile to WASM, so let's use it for front-end code as well.
To compile the front-end:
I've had a hard time testing this. I think it would be better to
cargo web deploy
without location, and do some processing (addingstatic/
to path so the new route is not required) and copying by ourselves in build.rs. Currently the instructions are pollutingstatic/
with anindex.html
I think this file souldn't be committed, it's auto generated and things like
__cargo_web_snippet_199d5eb25dfe761687bcd487578eb7e636bd9650
are probably not reproducible between buildsYou can now just use
cargo web deploy
, build.rs will do the rest.how much faster is the resulting wasm compared to the previous Javascript?
@igalic considering our use-case, probably not much. The main advantage is the whole team being able to debug it I think
There may be better performances once with the future editor, especially when writing big articles. Another advantage is that we will be able to share code between backend and frontend if we need it.
@BaptisteGelez I see Travis failed because of cargo-web installation, you might be interested into this https://github.com/koute/cargo-web#using-cargo-web-on-travis .
Codecov Report
You should also update documentation, something like add "run
cargo web deploy -p plume-front
"this line is no longer required