Recenzenci
Poproś o recenzję
Brak recenzentów
Etykiety
Wyczyść etykiety
Related to the REST API
Code running on the server
Stuff related to Federation
Related to the front-end
Translations, and related code
More about project management or code than the project itself
The building, or installation process of Plume
Something isn't working
We need to talk
New feature or request
This is a new feature
Compatibility with different browsers, readers and OS
Related to an external package that Plume uses
UI/UX related issues and PRs
Good for newcomers
Extra attention is needed
Issues affecting only mobile UX
How elements're rendered out for the end user
Something else needs to be fixed first
This issue or pull request already exists
This PR is not complete yet
Issues concern a limited number of instances
This doesn't seem right
Need to be discussed by the community (on Loomio)
This PR is ready to be reviewed
Proposed ideas worth considering
This is issue has been created after a vote on Loomio
This will not be worked on
Zastosuj etykiety
A: API
Related to the REST API
A: Backend
Code running on the server
A: Federation
Stuff related to Federation
A: Front-End
Related to the front-end
A: I18N
Translations, and related code
A: Meta
More about project management or code than the project itself
A: Security
Build
The building, or installation process of Plume
C: Bug
Something isn't working
C: Discussion
We need to talk
C: Enhancement
New feature or request
C: Feature
This is a new feature
Compatibility
Compatibility with different browsers, readers and OS
Dependency
Related to an external package that Plume uses
Design
UI/UX related issues and PRs
Documentation
Good first issue
Good for newcomers
Help welcome
Extra attention is needed
Mobile
Issues affecting only mobile UX
Rendering
How elements're rendered out for the end user
S: Blocked
Something else needs to be fixed first
S: Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
S: Incomplete
This PR is not complete yet
S: Instance specific
Issues concern a limited number of instances
S: Invalid
This doesn't seem right
S: Needs Voting/Discussion
Need to be discussed by the community (on Loomio)
S: Ready for review
This PR is ready to be reviewed
Suggestion
Proposed ideas worth considering
S: Voted on Loomio
This is issue has been created after a vote on Loomio
S: Wontfix
This will not be worked on
Brak etykiety
A: API
A: Backend
A: Federation
A: Front-End
A: I18N
A: Meta
A: Security
Build
C: Bug
C: Discussion
C: Enhancement
C: Feature
Compatibility
Dependency
Design
Documentation
Good first issue
Help welcome
Mobile
Rendering
S: Blocked
S: Duplicate
S: Incomplete
S: Instance specific
S: Invalid
S: Needs Voting/Discussion
S: Ready for review
Suggestion
S: Voted on Loomio
S: Wontfix
Kamień milowy
Ustaw kamień milowy
Wyczyść kamień milowy
Brak elementów
Brak kamienia milowego
Przypisani
Przypisz użytkowników
Usuń przypisanych
Brak przypisanych
Uczestnicy 2
Powiadomienia
Termin realizacji
Data realizacji jest niewłaściwa lub spoza zakresu. Użyj formatu 'yyyy-mm-dd'.
Brak ustawionego terminu realizacji.
Zależności
No dependencies set.
Reference: Plume/Plume#455
Reference in New Issue
Nie ma jeszcze treści.
Usuń gałąź 'fix-follow-id'
Usunięcie gałęzi jest trwałe i NIE MOŻE zostać cofnięte. Kontynuować?
Nie
Tak
I changed the syntax of the
insert!
macro, allowing to modify an object just after it was saved to the database. You can now optional pass it a "closure" (actually it just looks like a closure) that will be run just after the insertion.I updated all the models, including Follow, to use it to generate AP ID and URL. The advantages are that the ID/URL are now correct (fixes #449) and that we don't have methods like
update_boxes
orupdate_ap_url
to call manually and that were easy to forget.@ -228,4 +228,3 @@
post.cover_id = form.cover;
post.update(&*conn, &searcher).expect("post::update: update error");;
let post = post.update_ap_url(&*conn).expect("post::update: update ap url error");
Just a note: I removed that without replacing it with something else, since it is incorrect (the AP IDs should change), and was not working anyway (since we were checking if
ap_url
was empty before updating it, which was only the case on newly created articles).Codecov Report
LGTM
I've never used this syntax, but it looks super nice
this route should really get implemented one day
Yes, I think we already have an issue for it…
what does it do?
For all the fields that were not provided, it takes their value from the given struct (here
NewBlog::default()
).Recenzenci
2a188abfa1
.Krok 1:
Z repozytorium twojego projektu, sprawdź nową gałąź i przetestuj zmiany.Krok 2:
Połącz zmiany i zaktualizuj na Forgejo.