Hide cw pictures behind a summary/details #483
Nessun revisore
Etichette
Nessuna etichetta
A: API
A: Backend
A: Federation
A: Front-End
A: I18N
A: Meta
A: Security
Build
C: Bug
C: Discussion
C: Enhancement
C: Feature
Compatibility
Dependency
Design
Documentation
Good first issue
Help welcome
Mobile
Rendering
S: Blocked
S: Duplicate
S: Incomplete
S: Instance specific
S: Invalid
S: Needs Voting/Discussion
S: Ready for review
Suggestion
S: Voted on Loomio
S: Wontfix
Nessuna pietra miliare
Nessun progetto
Nessun assegnatario
2 partecipanti
Notifiche
Scadenza
Nessuna scadenza impostata.
Dipendenze
Nessuna dipendenza impostata.
Riferimento: Plume/Plume#483
Caricamento…
Add table
Crea riferimento in una nuova segnalazione
Descrizione non fornita.
Elimina ramo "cw"
L'eliminazione di un ramo è definitiva. Nonostante il ramo eliminato potrebbe continuare ad esistere per un breve periodo di tempo prima di essere realmente eliminato, l'eliminazione NON PUÒ essere annullata in molti casi. Continuare?
This is an attempt at fixing #254
Sadly it doesn't work with the new editor, as html tags are put in a
<code>
blocIt makes me notice that one can copy almost any HTML in the editor, which is a bit weird, and full of bug (and maybe of security risks?). I think we should add a listener for
onpaste
and filter what is pasted (to only allow images or simple text)from what I see, any html pasted is surrounded with
<code>
. There are no more risks than with the previous editor. Filtering/modifying what is pasted might be nice in some situations, sometime one just want to put some html elements not supported by plain markdownCodecov Report
tested with #486, the md tag is not interpreted as it is inside some html. Maybe I should put plain html instead of markdown when using cw
I think Markdown in HTML never worked. At least it doesn't on GitHub:
So yes, going with HTML for everything seems to be a better solution. Ideally, we should have some kind of custom Markdown like ![132] where 132 is the idea of a media, and then Plume just replaces it with the full HTML code, but this is probably quite hard to achieve.
It might not be that hard actually, we "just" have to match with the Event
Start(Image(_, _, _))
and map it to our custom htmlUser should input something like


If the corresponding picture has a cw, it display this
And after clicking on it, it shows the picture (this is a toggle, so clicking again hide it back).
Hum, there is a small bug if the same picture with cw is present twice, clicking on the second will only activate the first one. I shall probably add some random to the generated id
The warning and the image it hides doesn't have exactly the same size on my computer, but I think it is because of experiments I made with the editor.
Works perfectly otherwise. Thank you!
it's not from your experiments. It seems to came from the rule adding a 3em margin on
main article img