add enum containing all successful route returns #614

Unito

igalic ha unito 10 commit da refactor/route-result a master

igalic ha commentato (Migrato da github.com)

This enum derives Responder, so it can be used as route result.
We also implement From, so it can be converted

This pr addresses #613

This enum derives `Responder`, so it can be used as route result. We also implement `From`, so it can be converted This pr addresses #613

codecov[bot] ha commentato (Migrato da github.com)

Codecov Report

Merging #614 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #614   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   35.31%   35.31%           
=======================================
  Files          68       68           
  Lines        7907     7907           
  Branches     1893     1893           
=======================================
  Hits         2792     2792           
  Misses       4345     4345           
  Partials      770      770

# [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/pull/614?src=pr&el=h1) Report > Merging [#614](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/pull/614?src=pr&el=desc) into [master](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/commit/4b205fa995a6935a2512a9725d84635e889db48e?src=pr&el=desc) will **not change** coverage. > The diff coverage is `0%`. ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #614 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 35.31% 35.31% ======================================= Files 68 68 Lines 7907 7907 Branches 1893 1893 ======================================= Hits 2792 2792 Misses 4345 4345 Partials 770 770 ```

igalic ha commentato (Migrato da github.com)

I've marked this pull request now ready for review.
even though there's at least one function left that could be improved (in readability, or at least refractored to use this enum)
but i don't think we can make further strides without improving our ErrorPage

I've marked this pull request now ready for review. even though there's at least one function left that could be improved (in readability, or at least refractored to use this enum) but i don't think we can make further strides without improving our ErrorPage

rfwatson (Migrato da github.com) revisionato

src/routes/blogs.rs

rfwatson (Migrato da github.com) ha commentato

So if I read this correctly, the Rust compiler infers the type from the return type of the function, allowing into() to function as expected?

Even though I should probably expect that from Rust, that's still pretty neat.

So if I read this correctly, the Rust compiler infers the type from the return type of the function, allowing `into()` to function as expected? Even though I should probably expect that from Rust, that's still pretty neat.

trinity-1686a revisionato

trinity-1686a lascia un commento

Proprietario

👍

:+1:

src/routes/session.rs

trinity-1686a ha commentato

Proprietario

Isn't it a bit strange that when redirecting to invalid uri, it gives an error? It would probably make more sens that the chain on line 100 does the parsing to, and default to parse("/").unwrap(). Also it should probably be a Origin to block redirection to other domain
(this is also true for previous code, it's pretty old, I'm pretty sure we did not do code review last September)

Isn't it a bit strange that when redirecting to invalid uri, it gives an error? It would probably make more sens that the chain on line 100 does the parsing to, and default to `parse("/").unwrap()`. Also it should probably be a [Origin](https://api.rocket.rs/v0.4/rocket/http/uri/struct.Origin.html) to block redirection to other domain (this is also true for previous code, it's pretty old, I'm pretty sure we did not do code review last September)

igalic (Migrato da github.com) revisionato

src/routes/session.rs

igalic (Migrato da github.com) ha commentato

do you have a suggestion for improvement?

trinity-1686a revisionato

src/routes/session.rs

trinity-1686a ha commentato

Proprietario

I do but I don't know how to explain it with words, so I'll probably do it myself during the week end

trinity-1686a hanno approvato queste modifiche

igalic (Migrato da github.com) revisionato

src/routes/session.rs

igalic (Migrato da github.com) ha commentato

well, I'll be happy to review it then, and help with words where necessary

i used to be quite good with words, now i'm procrastinating on writing words, by working on a blogging platform.

well, I'll be happy to review it then, and help with words where necessary i used to be quite good with words, now i'm procrastinating on writing words, by working on a blogging platform.

Revisori

trinity-1686a hanno approvato queste modifiche

La pull request è stata unita come 3d27e283ad.

Puoi anche visualizzare le istruzioni da riga di comando.

Passo 1:

Dal repository del tuo progetto, fai il check out di un nuovo branch e verifica le modifiche.

git checkout -b refactor/route-result master

git pull origin refactor/route-result

Passo 2:

Fai il merge delle modifiche e aggiorna su Forgejo.

git checkout master

git merge --no-ff refactor/route-result

git push origin master

Effettua l'accesso per partecipare alla conversazione.

Nessun revisore

Nessuna milestone

Nessuna assegnatario

2 Partecipanti

Notifiche

Data di scadenza

La data di scadenza non è valida o fuori intervallo. Si prega di utilizzare il formato 'aaaa-mm-dd'.

Nessuna data di scadenza impostata.

Dipendenze

Nessuna dipendenza impostata.

Caricamento…

Non ci sono ancora contenuti.

Etichette Traguardi

add enum containing all successful route returns #614

Codecov Report

Revisori

Passo 1:

Passo 2: