plume-model: refactor Searcher to have its own DbPool #809

Gesloten
igalic wilt 6 commits van igalic/Plume:refactor/extract-searcher-with-dbpool samenvoegen met main
Eigenaar

This PR is another attempt at fixing #799

Instead of relying on a separate actor model, as described, we make use of the fact that DbPool is an Arc, and can be arbitrarily cloned, so we add it to Searcher. Further more, and db_pool.get() acts like sending a message to an Actor: if there are enough connections, the Pool gives us one, if not, tough luck!

this way, we don't need to pass along a conn into the searcher functions.
This should make splitting PlumeRocket up into its components a little easier.

This PR is another attempt at fixing #799 Instead of relying on a separate actor model, as described, we make use of the fact that DbPool is an `Arc`, and can be arbitrarily cloned, so we add it to `Searcher`. Further more, and `db_pool.get()` *acts* like sending a message to an Actor: if there are enough connections, the Pool gives us one, if not, tough luck! this way, we don't need to pass along a conn into the searcher functions. This should make splitting PlumeRocket up into its components a little easier.
kiwii heeft deze veranderingen 2020-07-23 18:35:10 +00:00 goedgekeurd
kiwii heeft een reactie achtergelaten
Eigenaar

👌

👌
@ -175,15 +186,16 @@ impl Searcher {
let lang = schema.get_field("lang").unwrap();
let license = schema.get_field("license").unwrap();
let conn = self.dbpool.get().unwrap();
Eigenaar

I would prefer using ? instead of unwrap here.

I would prefer using `?` instead of `unwrap` here.
Auteur
Eigenaar

can you briefly explain why?

we use .unwrap() in all other lines.

can you briefly explain why? we use `.unwrap()` in all other lines.
Eigenaar

I think all the previous ones are safe: we now it can't panic because we control the search index schema, we know that these fields exist (even if Rust can't check this at comoile-time). Here, we may fail to get a DB connection from the pool for whatever reason, and I think we should make the error "go up", so that the web UI or the CLI can display a proper error.

I think all the previous ones are safe: we now it can't panic because we control the search index schema, we know that these fields exist (even if Rust can't check this at comoile-time). Here, we may fail to get a DB connection from the pool for whatever reason, and I think we should make the error "go up", so that the web UI or the CLI can display a proper error.
@ -222,24 +229,27 @@ impl Searcher {
let searcher = self.reader.searcher();
let res = searcher.search(&query.into_query(), &collector).unwrap();
let conn = self.dbpool.get().unwrap();
Eigenaar

Same here.

Same here.
igalic beoordeeld 2020-07-24 14:49:47 +00:00
igalic heeft een reactie achtergelaten
Auteur
Eigenaar

👀

👀
@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ pub enum Error {
Io(std::io::Error),
MissingApProperty,
NotFound,
DbPool,
Auteur
Eigenaar

you're not trying to convert the original diesel::r2d2::Error?

you're not trying to convert the original `diesel::r2d2::Error`?
Eigenaar

It is a r2d2::Error, not the same as Diesel's one apparently. And I don't want to add another direct dependency in our Cargo.toml.

It is a `r2d2::Error`, not the same as Diesel's one apparently. And I don't want to add another direct dependency in our Cargo.toml.
Auteur
Eigenaar

gonna have to ask somebody how the heck this is happening

gonna have to ask somebody how the heck this is happening
@ -177,1 +188,4 @@
let conn = match self.dbpool.get() {
Ok(c) => c,
Err(_) => return Err(Error::DbPool),
Auteur
Eigenaar

that means we won't know exactly why the pool didn't give us a connection

that means we won't know exactly why the pool didn't give us a connection
igalic beoordeeld 2020-07-24 15:46:38 +00:00
igalic heeft een reactie achtergelaten
Auteur
Eigenaar

🙋🏻‍♀️

🙋🏻‍♀️
@ -31,0 +55,4 @@
///
/// The panic messages are normally explicit enough for a human to
/// understand how to fix the issue when they see it.
pub fn new(db_pool: DbPool) -> Arc<Self> {
Auteur
Eigenaar

why are we returning Arc<Self>?
this means our code needs to know exactly how it's going to be used

what about cli? does that use an Arc?

i would use this function to only return a Self
there's no need to init_pool, we just want a copy

we can create an initialize method, which tries to call open and create methods in the appropriate order with the error recovery, if that makes sense here

but as it stands, for a new function, this does too much

why are we returning `Arc<Self>`? this means our code needs to know exactly how it's going to be used what about cli? does that use an Arc? i would use this function to only return a Self there's no need to init_pool, we just want a copy we can create an initialize method, which tries to call open and create *methods* in the appropriate order with the error recovery, if that makes sense here but as it stands, for a new function, this does too much
igalic force-push refactor/extract-searcher-with-dbpool van 9309ed279f naar a5c81498b2 2020-07-24 20:12:17 +00:00 Vergelijk
igalic toegevoegd 1 commit 2020-07-25 08:05:45 +00:00
this will not compile, so now it's time to fix the rest
Auteur
Eigenaar

closing in favour of #813

closing in favour of #813
igalic heeft deze pull request gesloten 2020-07-26 19:37:26 +00:00

Pull request gesloten

Log in om deel te nemen aan deze discussie.
Geen beoordelaars
Geen mijlpaal
Geen project
Niet toegewezen
2 deelnemers
Notificaties
Vervaldatum
De deadline is ongeldig of buiten bereik. Gebruik het formaat "jjjj-mm-dd'.

Geen vervaldatum ingesteld.

Afhankelijkheden

Geen afhankelijkheden ingesteld.

Referentie: Plume/Plume#809
Geen beschrijving gegeven.