Rename reshares #74

Closed
opened 6 years ago by Madeorsk · 2 comments
Madeorsk commented 6 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

I don't like the term "reshare". I understand that the idea behind this word is to say that we share a second time, but I think that a second share should still be named a "share".

We use the word "Publish" in the button to create a new blog post, why not using this word again and rename "reshare" to "republish"?

I don't like the term "reshare". I understand that the idea behind this word is to say that we share a second time, but I think that a second share should still be named a "share". We use the word "Publish" in the button to create a new blog post, why not using this word again and rename "reshare" to "republish"?
zcdunn commented 6 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

At the risk of starting a long bikeshed, I'd like to suggest 'boost' as the alternative. When you share an article somebody has written, you're boosting its visibility and it sounds less technical than republish or share

At the risk of starting a long bikeshed, I'd like to suggest 'boost' as the alternative. When you share an article somebody has written, you're boosting its visibility and it sounds less technical than republish or share
elegaanz commented 6 years ago (Migrated from github.com)

I really like the idea that "boost" conveys, it doesn't feel like you are "stealing" someone else work.

I really like the idea that "boost" conveys, it doesn't feel like you are "stealing" someone else work.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Plume/Plume#74
Loading…
There is no content yet.