Article cover #299

已合併
elegaanz 將 8 次提交從 article-cover 合併至 master 6 年前
elegaanz 已留言 6 年前 (已從 github.com 遷移)

Screenshots:

On the article page

On the home page

Fixes #236

Screenshots: ![On the article page](https://social.wxcafe.net/system/media_attachments/files/001/270/277/original/2cd574456e31d710.png?1540982197) ![On the home page](https://social.wxcafe.net/system/media_attachments/files/001/270/278/original/adaec1bcbc0ff751.png?1540982220) Fixes #236
elegaanz 已留言 6 年前 (已從 github.com 遷移)

I'm not 100% satisfied with the cover selector (a <select> field listing your media) but if we want to have a JavaScript-free implementation and to avoid duplicating the media upload form, I don't see any better solution. 🤷‍♀️

I'm not 100% satisfied with the cover selector (a `<select>` field listing your media) but if we want to have a JavaScript-free implementation and to avoid duplicating the media upload form, I don't see any better solution. :woman_shrugging:
trinity-1686a 已審核 6 年前
trinity-1686a 留下了回應
擁有者

I'm getting an error when accessing the page to create a new post, however only when I have at least one media uploaded with that account, and there is no issue with /~/<blog>/<slug>/edit

GET /~/Yoloswagg/new/ text/html:
    => Matched: GET /~/<blog>/new (new)
    => Error: Error rendering Tera template 'posts/new'.
    => Error: Failed to render 'posts/new'
    => Error: Variable `form.cover` not found in context while rendering 'posts/new'
    => Error: Template 'posts/new' failed to render.
    => Outcome: Failure
    => Warning: Responding with 500 Internal Server Error catcher.
    => Response succeeded.

About the cover selector, to be frank I don't really like how medias works currently, it feels strange to go to /medias/ to change your avatar. It feels strange too to upload medias on a page different than the one where you write your posts (which will hopefully be better when we start working on a rich text editor), and choosing from a <select> what media will be the cover feels the same, maybe even worth for peoples having a lot of uploaded medias as the time goes. It can stay like that for the moment, but we will need to address this in the future.
Also make me through of one thing : while it's using a <select>, you should filter to only show images, not audio content for example (actually the same goes for peoples avatar, currently they can be an audio file)

I'm getting an error when accessing the page to create a new post, however only when I have at least one media uploaded with that account, and there is no issue with `/~/<blog>/<slug>/edit` ``` GET /~/Yoloswagg/new/ text/html: => Matched: GET /~/<blog>/new (new) => Error: Error rendering Tera template 'posts/new'. => Error: Failed to render 'posts/new' => Error: Variable `form.cover` not found in context while rendering 'posts/new' => Error: Template 'posts/new' failed to render. => Outcome: Failure => Warning: Responding with 500 Internal Server Error catcher. => Response succeeded. ``` About the cover selector, to be frank I don't really like how medias works currently, it feels strange to go to /medias/<id> to change your avatar. It feels strange too to upload medias on a page different than the one where you write your posts (which will hopefully be better when we start working on a rich text editor), and choosing from a `<select>` what media will be the cover feels the same, maybe even worth for peoples having a lot of uploaded medias as the time goes. It can stay like that for the moment, but we will need to address this in the future. Also make me through of one thing : while it's using a `<select>`, you should filter to only show images, not audio content for example (actually the same goes for peoples avatar, currently they can be an audio file)
@ -633,0 +633,4 @@
#, fuzzy
msgid "Illustration"
msgstr "Administration"
擁有者

wow fuzzy translation is so wrong

wow fuzzy translation is so wrong
elegaanz 已留言 6 年前 (已從 github.com 遷移)

Yes, I agree the way media are currently working is not ideal. I think we can change it once will we will switch to a new editor, by adding the possibility to upload an avatar directly from the profile edition page, and to add any other media directly from the editor.

Yes, I agree the way media are currently working is not ideal. I think we can change it once will we will switch to a new editor, by adding the possibility to upload an avatar directly from the profile edition page, and to add any other media directly from the editor.
擁有者

Anyway changing how we handle medias is neither the goal nor in the scope of this pr, so even if it's less than ideal, it shouldn't affect how we merge this pr (and actually making sure people are not using a song as a picture is not that important as in the end how they select those will be totally changed latter on)

Anyway changing how we handle medias is neither the goal nor in the scope of this pr, so even if it's less than ideal, it shouldn't affect how we merge this pr (and actually making sure people are not using a song as a picture is not that important as in the end how they select those will be totally changed latter on)
trinity-1686a 已審核 6 年前
擁有者

This is the exact line that is failing. I think you can't compare form.cover because form is null when creating a new article. if not form.cover (2 lines above) is legal as it verify the existence of the field, and its "nullness", but a compare only make sense if the field exist, it being null or not

This is the exact line that is failing. I think you can't compare `form.cover` because `form` is `null` when creating a new article. `if not form.cover` (2 lines above) is legal as it verify the existence of the field, and its "nullness", but a compare only make sense if the field exist, it being null or not
trinity-1686a 已審核 6 年前
擁有者

Those 3 println! were for debug only I guess, so they should be removed

Those 3 `println!` were for debug only I guess, so they should be removed
elegaanz (已從 github.com 遷移) 已審核 6 年前
elegaanz (已從 github.com 遷移) 已留言 6 年前

Oops, you're right. 😬

Oops, you're right. :grimacing:
trinity-1686a 核可了這些變更 6 年前

審核者

trinity-1686a 核可了這些變更 6 年前
此合併請求已被合併為 25b7399e7f
您也可以查看命令列指南

第一步:

在您的儲存庫中切換到新分支並測試變更。
git checkout -b article-cover master
git pull origin article-cover

第二步:

合併變更並更新到 Forgejo。
git checkout master
git merge --no-ff article-cover
git push origin master
登入 才能加入這對話。
沒有審核者
未選擇里程碑
沒有負責人
2 參與者
通知
截止日期
截止日期無效或超出範圍,請使用「yyyy-mm-dd」的格式。

未設定截止日期。

先決條件

未設定先決條件。

參考: Plume/Plume#299
載入中…
尚未有任何內容