#552 Add some feedback when performing some actions

Merged
elegaanz merged 7 commits from action-feedback into master 1 year ago
elegaanz commented 1 year ago (Migrated from github.com)

Here is an example of what it looks like (this is just a test, in reality you can only have one of these messages at the same time):

Screenshot_2019-04-27 Plume unu ⋅ Plume

I don’t know if there is a simpler way to do it. Also, I added msg: Option<FlashMessage> to almost all routes to be sure that if a message was present it would be rendered, but maybe it is not necessary and only make the code harder to read? And maybe msg should go in PlumeRocket as it is used almost everywhere?

Fixes #468

Here is an example of what it looks like (this is just a test, in reality you can only have one of these messages at the same time): ![Screenshot_2019-04-27 Plume unu ⋅ Plume](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/16254623/56852089-77178700-690e-11e9-88fc-acb089b58fef.png) I don't know if there is a simpler way to do it. Also, I added `msg: Option<FlashMessage>` to almost all routes to be sure that if a message was present it would be rendered, but maybe it is not necessary and only make the code harder to read? And maybe `msg` should go in `PlumeRocket` as it is used almost everywhere? Fixes #468
codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago (Migrated from github.com)
Owner

Codecov Report

Merging #552 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 5.12%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #552      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   44.08%   44.11%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          68       68              
  Lines        7937     7984      +47     
==========================================
+ Hits         3499     3522      +23     
- Misses       4438     4462      +24
# [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/pull/552?src=pr&el=h1) Report > Merging [#552](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/pull/552?src=pr&el=desc) into [master](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/commit/787eb7f3992e43e7a149288f3378c90dd4fe4bf8?src=pr&el=desc) will **increase** coverage by `0.02%`. > The diff coverage is `5.12%`. ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #552 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 44.08% 44.11% +0.02% ========================================== Files 68 68 Lines 7937 7984 +47 ========================================== + Hits 3499 3522 +23 - Misses 4438 4462 +24 ```
trinity-1686a commented 1 year ago
Owner

And maybe msg should go in PlumeRocket as it is used almost everywhere?

Considering how it must be everywhere, I think it can go in PlumeRocket, as well as in template BaseContext. Also BaseContext could implement From<PlumeRocket> so it is easier to build and reduce duplication

> And maybe `msg` should go in `PlumeRocket` as it is used almost everywhere? Considering how it must be everywhere, I think it can go in `PlumeRocket`, as well as in template `BaseContext`. Also `BaseContext` could implement `From<PlumeRocket>` so it is easier to build and reduce duplication
igalic (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 1 year ago
igalic (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

maybe we should hold on committing the translations in such prs?

do then regularly elsewhere

Plume_migration_agent commented 1 year ago

this is supposed to be

Ti nisi autor ovog(a?) bloga

but i just realised that fuzzy means it was auto translated…

this is supposed to be > Ti nisi autor ovog(a?) bloga but i just realised that fuzzy means it was auto translated…
elegaanz commented 1 year ago (Migrated from github.com)
Owner

@igalic I don’t really know… it is true it pollutes a little bit the diff, but at the same time it makes sense to have them with the change in the interface.

@igalic I don't really know… it is true it pollutes a little bit the diff, but at the same time it makes sense to have them with the change in the interface.
elegaanz (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 1 year ago
Plume_migration_agent commented 1 year ago

Yes, it was auto-translated. Once it will be on Crowdin, you will be able to fix it. 😉

Yes, it was auto-translated. Once it will be on Crowdin, you will be able to fix it. :wink:
trinity-1686a commented 1 year ago
Owner

I’d be to not pollute pr with this, and have something that autocommit the changes once a week, or after each merge

I'd be to not pollute pr with this, and have something that autocommit the changes once a week, or after each merge
trinity-1686a reviewed 1 year ago
trinity-1686a left a comment

👀

@@ -17,0 +27,4 @@
&Connection,
&Catalog,
Option<User>,
Option<(String, String)>,
trinity-1686a commented 1 year ago

why not implementing From<PlumeRocket> for Context? It will auto implement Into<Context> for PlumeRocket, and you should be able to use into() with no need to import this trait everywhere

why not implementing `From<PlumeRocket>` for Context? It will auto implement `Into<Context>` for PlumeRocket, and you should be able to use `into()` with no need to import this trait everywhere
elegaanz (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 1 year ago
@@ -17,0 +27,4 @@
&Connection,
&Catalog,
Option<User>,
Option<(String, String)>,
Plume_migration_agent commented 1 year ago

Because Rust is complaining about the fact that all the parameters of the trait comes from another crate, and that it could cause conflicts, while I don’t think it can? 🤷‍♀️ But yeah, I tried it, and it doesn’t work.

Because Rust is complaining about the fact that all the parameters of the trait comes from another crate, and that it could cause conflicts, while I don't think it can? :woman_shrugging: But yeah, I tried it, and it doesn't work.
trinity-1686a reviewed 1 year ago
@@ -17,0 +27,4 @@
&Connection,
&Catalog,
Option<User>,
Option<(String, String)>,
trinity-1686a commented 1 year ago

ho, it’s because BaseContext is not a true struct but a typedef to a tuple of basic types (in theory it could cause conflict, because the exact same trait can be implemented in plume-model, thus creating a conflict). This mean we can either convert BaseContext to be a true type, or implement Into in plume-models. I’ve tried the first one, but it requires some small but ugly changes so I’m not sure it would be better (you can take a look at the patch here)

ho, it's because BaseContext is not a true struct but a typedef to a tuple of basic types (in theory it could cause conflict, because the exact same trait can be implemented in plume-model, thus creating a conflict). This mean we can either convert BaseContext to be a true type, or implement Into in plume-models. I've tried the first one, but it requires some small but ugly changes so I'm not sure it would be better (you can take a look at the patch [here](https://framadrop.org/r/aXcBuKkLEW#rzbPsNSdq+XCFboTnRLdY8Qt3RNqqUYGgrnA8bfUoQQ=))
trinity-1686a approved these changes 1 year ago
trinity-1686a left a comment

👍

elegaanz commented 1 year ago (Migrated from github.com)
Owner

Do you want me to apply your patch before merging?

Do you want me to apply your patch before merging?
trinity-1686a commented 1 year ago
Owner

It was just to show what I came up with, but having &(&rockets).into() everywhere is definitely worse than importing a trait

It was just to show what I came up with, but having `&(&rockets).into()` everywhere is definitely worse than importing a trait

Reviewers

trinity-1686a approved these changes 1 year ago
The pull request has been merged as 8f1ab3485e.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

This pull request currently doesn't have any dependencies.

Loading…
There is no content yet.