#646 Replace the input! macro with an Input builder

Merged
elegaanz merged 4 commits from input-builder into master 1 year ago
elegaanz commented 1 year ago (Migrated from github.com)

Pros:

  • less ambiguities
  • more type safety
  • less cloning (we don’t clone forms for each input anymore)

Cons:

  • more verbose (but at the same time it is easier to parse IMO)
  • less natural syntax
Pros: - less ambiguities - more type safety - less cloning (we don't clone forms for each input anymore) Cons: - more verbose (but at the same time it is easier to parse IMO) - less natural syntax
codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago (Migrated from github.com)
Owner

Codecov Report

Merging #646 into master will decrease coverage by 0.26%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #646      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   35.06%   34.79%   -0.27%     
==========================================
  Files          68       68              
  Lines        7945     8006      +61     
  Branches     1890     1894       +4     
==========================================
  Hits         2786     2786              
- Misses       4383     4444      +61     
  Partials      776      776
# [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/pull/646?src=pr&el=h1) Report > Merging [#646](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/pull/646?src=pr&el=desc) into [master](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/commit/a6c84daa1a242246ac01260eb9bc201dd6e47830?src=pr&el=desc) will **decrease** coverage by `0.26%`. > The diff coverage is `0%`. ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #646 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 35.06% 34.79% -0.27% ========================================== Files 68 68 Lines 7945 8006 +61 Branches 1890 1894 +4 ========================================== Hits 2786 2786 - Misses 4383 4444 +61 Partials 776 776 ```
igalic (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 1 year ago
igalic (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

this looks pretty cool!

trinity-1686a commented 1 year ago
Owner

Maybe implementing https://docs.rs/ructe/0.6.2/ructe/templates/trait.ToHtml.html would make more sens than a stand-alone function? Also, clippy is complaining about conventions, to_* usually take by reference

Maybe implementing https://docs.rs/ructe/0.6.2/ructe/templates/trait.ToHtml.html would make more sens than a stand-alone function? Also, clippy is complaining about conventions, to_* usually take by reference
elegaanz commented 1 year ago (Migrated from github.com)
Owner

I thought about it, but my function takes a gettex::Catalog, while ToHtml::to_html doesn’t. I could have passed it as an argument to Input::new tho.

But I made the commit before reading your review, so it is Input::html now (I can still change it if you prefer).

I thought about it, but my function takes a `gettex::Catalog`, while `ToHtml::to_html` doesn't. I could have passed it as an argument to `Input::new` tho. But I made the commit before reading your review, so it is `Input::html` now (I can still change it if you prefer).
igalic commented 1 year ago (Migrated from github.com)
Owner

definitely, what @fdb-hiroshima said


update / carification:
About implementing Ructe’s ToHtml trait.

definitely, what @fdb-hiroshima said ****** update / carification: About implementing Ructe's `ToHtml` trait.
trinity-1686a commented 1 year ago
Owner

I did not notice the Catalog. It was just a suggestion, but as it’s totally fine as is

I did not notice the Catalog. It was just a suggestion, but as it's totally fine as is
trinity-1686a commented 1 year ago
Owner

As .html() take the Catalog, and the provided label in Input::new is always translated, can’t it be translated transparently from .html() instead of explicitly each time? (I don’t know if it would be better or worst, that’s an actual question)

As `.html()` take the Catalog, and the provided label in Input::new is _always_ translated, can't it be translated transparently from `.html()` instead of explicitly each time? (I don't know if it would be better or worst, that's an actual question)
elegaanz commented 1 year ago (Migrated from github.com)
Owner

gettext-macros requires strings that are known at compile time, so that it can add them to the .pot file. With the latest version of the crate (which requires Rust 2018 for some reason, so we can’t use it now), there is a new macro, called t that would allow us to do:

Input::new("email", t!("Your email address"))
    .input_type("email")
    .html(catalog);

Which would be a bit better (but we can’t really do anything else than that I think, these strings should be marked as translatable with a macro at some point).

gettext-macros requires strings that are known at compile time, so that it can add them to the .pot file. With the latest version of the crate (which requires Rust 2018 for some reason, so we can't use it now), there is a new macro, called `t` that would allow us to do: ```rust Input::new("email", t!("Your email address")) .input_type("email") .html(catalog); ``` Which would be a bit better (but we can't really do anything else than that I think, these strings should be marked as translatable with a macro at some point).
trinity-1686a reviewed 1 year ago
trinity-1686a left a comment

👀

trinity-1686a commented 1 year ago

I think error is no longer put in a <p class="error" dir="auto">{}</p>

I think error is no longer put in a `<p class="error" dir="auto">{}</p>`
@@ -13,0 +13,4 @@
.default(&form.title)
.error(&errors)
.set_prop("minlength", 1)
.html(ctx.1))
trinity-1686a commented 1 year ago

previously had the requiredproperty

previously had the `required`property
@@ -18,3 +18,3 @@

<form method="post" action="@uri!(instance::update_settings)">
@input!(ctx.1, name (text), "Name", form, errors.clone(), "props")
@(Input::new("name", i18n!(ctx.1, "Name"))
trinity-1686a commented 1 year ago

what was props, why is it gone?

what was `props`, why is it gone?
trinity-1686a reviewed 1 year ago
@@ -13,0 +13,4 @@
.default(&form.title)
.error(&errors)
.set_prop("minlength", 1)
.html(ctx.1))
trinity-1686a commented 1 year ago

mb, it’s added automagically when not optional

mb, it's added automagically when not optional
elegaanz (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 1 year ago
@@ -18,3 +18,3 @@

<form method="post" action="@uri!(instance::update_settings)">
@input!(ctx.1, name (text), "Name", form, errors.clone(), "props")
@(Input::new("name", i18n!(ctx.1, "Name"))
Plume_migration_agent commented 1 year ago

I don’t know to be honest, but it clearly was here by mistake (this argument was for additional HTML properties).

I don't know to be honest, but it clearly was here by mistake (this argument was for additional HTML properties).
trinity-1686a approved these changes 1 year ago
trinity-1686a left a comment

👍

Reviewers

trinity-1686a approved these changes 1 year ago
The pull request has been merged as 8ab690001d.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

This pull request currently doesn't have any dependencies.

Loading…
There is no content yet.