Plume/Plume

Fork 24

cargo release helper #790

Closed

igalic wants to merge 50 commits from igalic/fix/cargo-release-helper into master

igalic commented

2020-06-21 21:17:42 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

add support for cargo-release
add & backfill Changelog!

how to use?

cargo release --dry-run --workspace minor

- add support for [cargo-release](https://github.com/sunng87/cargo-release) - add & backfill Changelog! ---- how to use? ```shell cargo release --dry-run --workspace minor ```

codecov[bot] commented

2020-06-21 22:10:59 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Codecov Report

Merging #790 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #790      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   39.09%   39.11%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          73       73              
  Lines        9756     9756              
  Branches     2233     2233              
==========================================
+ Hits         3814     3816       +2     
  Misses       4885     4885              
+ Partials     1057     1055       -2

# [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/pull/790?src=pr&el=h1) Report > Merging [#790](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/pull/790?src=pr&el=desc) into [master](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/commit/d99b42582d7a5a8c8087b6ebe067b944cae0c294&el=desc) will **increase** coverage by `0.02%`. > The diff coverage is `n/a`. ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #790 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 39.09% 39.11% +0.02% ========================================== Files 73 73 Lines 9756 9756 Branches 2233 2233 ========================================== + Hits 3814 3816 +2 Misses 4885 4885 + Partials 1057 1055 -2 ```

igalic commented

2020-06-21 22:46:30 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

uh… will we need to add it as development dependency?

elegaanz (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2020-06-22 12:23:51 +00:00

release.toml

elegaanz (Migrated from github.com) commented

2020-06-22 12:23:51 +00:00

Shouldn't the repo URL be changed here?

elegaanz commented

2020-06-22 12:25:35 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Also, maybe we could unify the headers in the changelog to follow what https://keepachangelog.com/ recommends, to keep it coherent.

And for the development dependency, I don't think so. It should be documented here that people who want to publish a new release should use this tool tho.

Also, maybe we could unify the headers in the changelog to follow what https://keepachangelog.com/ recommends, to keep it coherent. And for the development dependency, I don't think so. It should be documented [here](https://docs.joinplu.me/organization/release-process/) that people who want to publish a new release should use this tool tho.

👍 1

igalic (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2020-06-22 12:38:02 +00:00

release.toml

igalic (Migrated from github.com) commented

2020-06-22 12:38:02 +00:00

how?

elegaanz (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2020-06-22 12:40:03 +00:00

release.toml

elegaanz (Migrated from github.com) commented

2020-06-22 12:40:03 +00:00

To something like https://github.com/Plume-org/Plume/compare/{{tag_name}}...HEAD, so that the changelog links to our commit history.

To something like `https://github.com/Plume-org/Plume/compare/{{tag_name}}...HEAD`, so that the changelog links to our commit history.

elegaanz (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2020-06-22 12:41:23 +00:00

release.toml

elegaanz (Migrated from github.com) commented

2020-06-22 12:41:23 +00:00

Also, is there a  somewhere in the changelog you added? I can't find it.

Also, is there a `` somewhere in the changelog you added? I can't find it.

igalic commented

2020-06-22 12:44:51 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

n. b. : i've back-filled the changelog by copy-pasting the text from our github releases page

for the future of the changelog, i absolutely agree

n. b. : i've back-filled the changelog by copy-pasting the text from our github releases page for the future of the changelog, i absolutely agree

elegaanz commented

2020-06-22 12:46:42 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I know you copied what is on GitHub, but maybe we could change this text? Would it be a problem to have texts that are a bit different on Github and in the changelog? I would prefer to have the whole changelog have the same format (but that's arguable).

elegaanz commented

2020-06-22 12:55:17 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Also, could it be possible to add pre-release-hook to run crowdin pull (I don't remember the exact arguments, but basically : the command to pull the latest version of translations)? Or do you think it should be done manually before running cargo release?

Also, could it be possible to add `pre-release-hook` to run `crowdin pull` (I don't remember the exact arguments, but basically : the command to pull the latest version of translations)? Or do you think it should be done manually before running `cargo release`?

igalic commented

2020-06-22 13:49:03 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I know you copied what is on GitHub, but maybe we could change this text? Would it be a problem to have texts that are a bit different on Github and in the changelog? I would prefer to have the whole changelog have the same format (but that's arguable).

the only problem was time and energy
y'all have access to write to this PR, so, please, by all means, help me!!

Also, could it be possible to add pre-release-hook to run crowdin pull (I don't remember the exact arguments, but basically : the command to pull the latest version of translations)? Or do you think it should be done manually before running cargo release?

that's a very good idea!

how do i make it work?

◆ plume git:(fix/cargo-release-helper) ❯❯❯ crowdin pull
Project key is empty
✖ 1 plume git:(fix/cargo-release-helper) ❯❯❯

> I know you copied what is on GitHub, but maybe we could change this text? Would it be a problem to have texts that are a bit different on Github and in the changelog? I would prefer to have the whole changelog have the same format (but that's arguable). the only problem was time and energy y'all have access to write to this PR, so, please, by all means, help me!! > Also, could it be possible to add `pre-release-hook` to run `crowdin pull` (I don't remember the exact arguments, but basically : the command to pull the latest version of translations)? Or do you think it should be done manually before running `cargo release`? that's a very good idea! how do i make it work? ```shell ◆ plume git:(fix/cargo-release-helper) ❯❯❯ crowdin pull Project key is empty ✖ 1 plume git:(fix/cargo-release-helper) ❯❯❯ ```

elegaanz commented

2020-06-22 14:39:46 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I don't remember how the Crowdin CLI works, I'll check that and edit the PR. I'll also edit the changelog.

❤️ 1

elegaanz commented

2020-06-23 12:28:01 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

So the translations should be pulled now, if you have a CROWDIN_API_KEY in your env. We should remember to document how to get one before making a release.

So the translations should be pulled now, if you have a `CROWDIN_API_KEY` in your env. We should remember to document how to get one before making a release.

igalic commented

2020-06-23 12:41:23 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

So the translations should be pulled now, if you have a CROWDIN_API_KEY in your env. We should remember to document how to get one before making a release.

let's create a doc issue right now, and link it here

> So the translations should be pulled now, if you have a `CROWDIN_API_KEY` in your env. We should remember to document how to get one before making a release. let's create a doc issue right now, and link it here

elegaanz commented

2020-06-24 13:28:02 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

https://github.com/Plume-org/docs/issues/88

igalic commented

2020-06-24 14:17:49 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

what about docker?

elegaanz commented

2020-06-24 15:59:15 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

I think the release should be automatic, I'll check.

elegaanz commented

2020-06-24 16:00:50 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

It is not, I'll a hook.

elegaanz commented

2020-06-24 16:10:12 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

The thing is, the docker tag needs to be pushed after the git tag, and there is no post-release-hook in cargo release, apparently.

So maybe we can document that this has to be done manually, and do it by hand for the moment?

The thing is, the docker tag needs to be pushed after the git tag, and there is no `post-release-hook` in cargo release, apparently. So maybe we can document that this has to be done manually, and do it by hand for the moment?

igalic commented

2020-06-24 16:39:40 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

or we could add docker tag to the CI build process, only on tag

igalic commented

2020-06-25 11:52:52 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

yunohost relies on docker, right?
and it's one of the platforms that we recommend, thru our installation guide

yunohost relies on docker, right? and it's one of *the* platforms that we recommend, thru our installation guide

elegaanz commented

2020-06-25 18:05:02 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

It doesn't, it uses Bash scripts. I'm not sure if it is better tho… 😅

It doesn't, it uses Bash scripts. I'm not sure if it is better tho… :sweat_smile:

igalic (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2020-06-25 19:13:35 +00:00

release.toml

igalic (Migrated from github.com) commented

2020-06-25 19:13:35 +00:00

i didn't add it to our current changelog

KitaitiMakoto commented

2020-12-06 11:21:41 +00:00

Owner

We can tag to Docker images automatically by setting automate build properly.

KitaitiMakoto commented

2020-12-06 14:51:54 +00:00

Owner

A test succeeded:
(v0.5.1-test2 was pushed by plumeorg)

A test succeeded: ![](https://i.gyazo.com/c2a284d00404574c60588d00365f61b4.png) (v0.5.1-test2 was pushed by plumeorg)

KitaitiMakoto approved these changes 2020-12-06 15:27:03 +00:00

KitaitiMakoto left a comment

Owner

Remaining issue is how do we notify YunoHost maintainer. It is not an issue of cargo helper (this pul request's theme) but an issue of CI. So this pull request is ready to be merged.