Codecov Report

Merging #790 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #790      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   39.09%   39.11%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          73       73              
  Lines        9756     9756              
  Branches     2233     2233              
==========================================
+ Hits         3814     3816       +2     
  Misses       4885     4885              
+ Partials     1057     1055       -2     

uh… will we need to add it as development dependency?

Also, maybe we could unify the headers in the changelog to follow what https://keepachangelog.com/ recommends, to keep it coherent.

And for the development dependency, I don’t think so. It should be documented here that people who want to publish a new release should use this tool tho.

n. b. : i’ve back-filled the changelog by copy-pasting the text from our github releases page

for the future of the changelog, i absolutely agree

I know you copied what is on GitHub, but maybe we could change this text? Would it be a problem to have texts that are a bit different on Github and in the changelog? I would prefer to have the whole changelog have the same format (but that’s arguable).

Also, could it be possible to add pre-release-hook to run crowdin pull (I don’t remember the exact arguments, but basically : the command to pull the latest version of translations)? Or do you think it should be done manually before running cargo release?

I know you copied what is on GitHub, but maybe we could change this text? Would it be a problem to have texts that are a bit different on Github and in the changelog? I would prefer to have the whole changelog have the same format (but that’s arguable).

the only problem was time and energy
y’all have access to write to this PR, so, please, by all means, help me!!

Also, could it be possible to add pre-release-hook to run crowdin pull (I don’t remember the exact arguments, but basically : the command to pull the latest version of translations)? Or do you think it should be done manually before running cargo release?

that’s a very good idea!

how do i make it work?

◆ plume git:(fix/cargo-release-helper) ❯❯❯ crowdin pull
Project key is empty
✖ 1 plume git:(fix/cargo-release-helper) ❯❯❯ 

I don’t remember how the Crowdin CLI works, I’ll check that and edit the PR. I’ll also edit the changelog.

So the translations should be pulled now, if you have a CROWDIN_API_KEY in your env. We should remember to document how to get one before making a release.

So the translations should be pulled now, if you have a CROWDIN_API_KEY in your env. We should remember to document how to get one before making a release.

let’s create a doc issue right now, and link it here

https://github.com/Plume-org/docs/issues/88

what about docker?

I think the release should be automatic, I’ll check.

It is not, I’ll a hook.

The thing is, the docker tag needs to be pushed after the git tag, and there is no post-release-hook in cargo release, apparently.

So maybe we can document that this has to be done manually, and do it by hand for the moment?

or we could add docker tag to the CI build process, only on tag

yunohost relies on docker, right?
and it’s one of the platforms that we recommend, thru our installation guide

It doesn’t, it uses Bash scripts. I’m not sure if it is better tho… 😅

We can tag to Docker images automatically by setting automate build properly.

A test succeeded: (v0.5.1-test2 was pushed by plumeorg)

Closed as #835