rewrite circleci config #558

Слито
Plume_migration_agent слито 12 коммит(ов) из rework-ci в master 5 лет назад
trinity-1686a прокомментировал(а) 5 лет назад
Владелец
  • use better syntax
  • grcov for coverage
  • automatize crowdin interactions
- [x] use better syntax - [x] grcov for coverage - [x] automatize crowdin interactions
elegaanz (Перенесено из github.com) рассмотрел(а) изменения 5 лет назад
@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
[target.x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu]
# link dead code for coverage, attempt to reduce linking memory usage to not get killed
rustflags = ["-Clink-dead-code", "-Clink-args=-Xlinker --no-keep-memory -Xlinker --reduce-memory-overheads"]
rustflags = ["-Clink-args=-Xlinker --no-keep-memory -Xlinker --reduce-memory-overheads"]
elegaanz (Перенесено из github.com) прокомментировал(а) 5 лет назад

Don't we need to link dead code anymore?

Don't we need to link dead code anymore?
trinity-1686a рассмотрел(а) изменения 5 лет назад
@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
[target.x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu]
# link dead code for coverage, attempt to reduce linking memory usage to not get killed
rustflags = ["-Clink-dead-code", "-Clink-args=-Xlinker --no-keep-memory -Xlinker --reduce-memory-overheads"]
rustflags = ["-Clink-args=-Xlinker --no-keep-memory -Xlinker --reduce-memory-overheads"]
trinity-1686a прокомментировал(а) 5 лет назад
Автор
Владелец

It's somewhere it this line now https://github.com/Plume-org/Plume/pull/558/files#diff-1d37e48f9ceff6d8030570cd36286a61R74 , and having that here was an error : release builds were run with linked dead code too (not a problem, but it makes for bigger binaries)

It's somewhere it this line now https://github.com/Plume-org/Plume/pull/558/files#diff-1d37e48f9ceff6d8030570cd36286a61R74 , and having that here was an error : release builds were run with linked dead code too (not a problem, but it makes for bigger binaries)
elegaanz (Перенесено из github.com) рассмотрел(а) изменения 5 лет назад
elegaanz (Перенесено из github.com) прокомментировал(а) 5 лет назад

Could it be possible to give more distinct name to these? I think that because of that we get one job called "clippy" (or whatever) and another one "cliipy-1", but it is not clear which one uses SQlite or PostgreSQL.

Could it be possible to give more distinct name to these? I think that because of that we get one job called "clippy" (or whatever) and another one "cliipy-1", but it is not clear which one uses SQlite or PostgreSQL.
trinity-1686a рассмотрел(а) изменения 5 лет назад
trinity-1686a прокомментировал(а) 5 лет назад
Автор
Владелец

not without having to duplicate config sadly :/

not without having to duplicate config sadly :/
elegaanz (Перенесено из github.com) рассмотрел(а) изменения 5 лет назад
elegaanz (Перенесено из github.com) прокомментировал(а) 5 лет назад

OK, let's forget about it then, it was more bonus.

OK, let's forget about it then, it was more bonus.
codecov[bot] прокомментировал(а) 5 лет назад (Перенесено из github.com)

Codecov Report

Merging #558 into master will decrease coverage by 6.9%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #558      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   41.96%   35.05%   -6.91%     
==========================================
  Files          70       67       -3     
  Lines        8839     7825    -1014     
  Branches        0     1876    +1876     
==========================================
- Hits         3709     2743     -966     
+ Misses       5130     4323     -807     
- Partials        0      759     +759
# [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/pull/558?src=pr&el=h1) Report > Merging [#558](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/pull/558?src=pr&el=desc) into [master](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/commit/33a0c7dcd3c4377db338ed380ab33c88caeed4bf?src=pr&el=desc) will **decrease** coverage by `6.9%`. > The diff coverage is `100%`. ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #558 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 41.96% 35.05% -6.91% ========================================== Files 70 67 -3 Lines 8839 7825 -1014 Branches 0 1876 +1876 ========================================== - Hits 3709 2743 -966 + Misses 5130 4323 -807 - Partials 0 759 +759 ```
trinity-1686a рассмотрел(а) изменения 5 лет назад
trinity-1686a прокомментировал(а) 5 лет назад
Автор
Владелец

kinda related, I'd prefer to use an enum telling we should use sqlite or postgres, but there is no way to do conditional based on other things than boolean :/
And there is no way to select if we use a docker or not, just to select which one, so I run empty alpine when nothing is needed.
I feel like this new syntax is better than the previous, but it misses some core features to not feel hacky in many places

kinda related, I'd prefer to use an enum telling we should use sqlite or postgres, but there is no way to do conditional based on other things than boolean :/ And there is no way to select if we use a docker or not, just to select which one, so I run empty alpine when nothing is needed. I feel like this new syntax is better than the previous, but it misses some core features to not feel hacky in many places
igalic (Перенесено из github.com) рассмотрел(а) изменения 5 лет назад
igalic (Перенесено из github.com) оставил комментарий

😵

😵
@ -199,0 +92,4 @@
parameters:
package:
type: string
default: plume
igalic (Перенесено из github.com) прокомментировал(а) 5 лет назад

that seems excessive

that seems excessive
elegaanz (Перенесено из github.com) рассмотрел(а) изменения 5 лет назад
@ -199,0 +92,4 @@
parameters:
package:
type: string
default: plume
elegaanz (Перенесено из github.com) прокомментировал(а) 5 лет назад

Yeah, but don't worry, this was an old version, now we only repeat it a few times:

for i in 36 4 2 1 1; do
   ...

where i is the number of threads of the command.

It is to avoid job failures because of OOM errors.

Yeah, but don't worry, this was an old version, now we only repeat it a few times: ```bash for i in 36 4 2 1 1; do ... ``` where `i` is the number of threads of the command. It is to avoid job failures because of OOM errors.
trinity-1686a рассмотрел(а) изменения 5 лет назад
@ -199,0 +92,4 @@
parameters:
package:
type: string
default: plume
trinity-1686a прокомментировал(а) 5 лет назад
Автор
Владелец

I think you're reviewing an older commit

I think you're reviewing an older commit
elegaanz (Перенесено из github.com) одобрил(а) эти изменения 5 лет назад
elegaanz (Перенесено из github.com) оставил комментарий

Seems to work as expected (sorry for the long time, I didn't saw this was ready for review). Thank you!

Seems to work as expected (sorry for the long time, I didn't saw this was ready for review). Thank you!

Рецензенты

Запрос на слияние был объединен как 918bda14ec.
Вы также можете просмотреть инструкции командной строки.

Шаг 1:

В репозитории вашего проекта посмотрите новую ветку и протестируйте изменения.
git checkout -b rework-ci master
git pull origin rework-ci

Шаг 2:

Объединить изменения и обновить на Forgejo.
git checkout master
git merge --no-ff rework-ci
git push origin master
Войдите, чтобы присоединиться к обсуждению.
Нет рецензентов
Нет этапа
Нет назначенных лиц
2 участников
Уведомления
Срок выполнения
Срок действия недействителен или находится за пределами допустимого диапазона. Пожалуйста, используйте формат 'гггг-мм-дд'.

Срок выполнения не установлен.

Зависимости

Зависимостей нет.

Reference: Plume/Plume#558
Загрузка…
Пока нет содержимого.