8
16
Fork 22

rewrite circleci config #558

Zusammengeführt
Plume_migration_agent hat 12 Commits von rework-ci nach master vor 5 Jahren zusammengeführt
trinity-1686a hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert
Besitzer
  • use better syntax
  • grcov for coverage
  • automatize crowdin interactions
- [x] use better syntax - [x] grcov for coverage - [x] automatize crowdin interactions
elegaanz (Migriert von github.com) hat vor 5 Jahren überprüft
@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
[target.x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu]
# link dead code for coverage, attempt to reduce linking memory usage to not get killed
rustflags = ["-Clink-dead-code", "-Clink-args=-Xlinker --no-keep-memory -Xlinker --reduce-memory-overheads"]
rustflags = ["-Clink-args=-Xlinker --no-keep-memory -Xlinker --reduce-memory-overheads"]
elegaanz (Migriert von github.com) hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert

Don't we need to link dead code anymore?

Don't we need to link dead code anymore?
trinity-1686a hat vor 5 Jahren überprüft
@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
[target.x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu]
# link dead code for coverage, attempt to reduce linking memory usage to not get killed
rustflags = ["-Clink-dead-code", "-Clink-args=-Xlinker --no-keep-memory -Xlinker --reduce-memory-overheads"]
rustflags = ["-Clink-args=-Xlinker --no-keep-memory -Xlinker --reduce-memory-overheads"]
trinity-1686a hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert
Ersteller
Besitzer

It's somewhere it this line now https://github.com/Plume-org/Plume/pull/558/files#diff-1d37e48f9ceff6d8030570cd36286a61R74 , and having that here was an error : release builds were run with linked dead code too (not a problem, but it makes for bigger binaries)

It's somewhere it this line now https://github.com/Plume-org/Plume/pull/558/files#diff-1d37e48f9ceff6d8030570cd36286a61R74 , and having that here was an error : release builds were run with linked dead code too (not a problem, but it makes for bigger binaries)
elegaanz (Migriert von github.com) hat vor 5 Jahren überprüft
elegaanz (Migriert von github.com) hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert

Could it be possible to give more distinct name to these? I think that because of that we get one job called "clippy" (or whatever) and another one "cliipy-1", but it is not clear which one uses SQlite or PostgreSQL.

Could it be possible to give more distinct name to these? I think that because of that we get one job called "clippy" (or whatever) and another one "cliipy-1", but it is not clear which one uses SQlite or PostgreSQL.
trinity-1686a hat vor 5 Jahren überprüft
trinity-1686a hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert
Ersteller
Besitzer

not without having to duplicate config sadly :/

not without having to duplicate config sadly :/
elegaanz (Migriert von github.com) hat vor 5 Jahren überprüft
elegaanz (Migriert von github.com) hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert

OK, let's forget about it then, it was more bonus.

OK, let's forget about it then, it was more bonus.
codecov[bot] hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert (Migriert von github.com)

Codecov Report

Merging #558 into master will decrease coverage by 6.9%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #558      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   41.96%   35.05%   -6.91%     
==========================================
  Files          70       67       -3     
  Lines        8839     7825    -1014     
  Branches        0     1876    +1876     
==========================================
- Hits         3709     2743     -966     
+ Misses       5130     4323     -807     
- Partials        0      759     +759
# [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/pull/558?src=pr&el=h1) Report > Merging [#558](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/pull/558?src=pr&el=desc) into [master](https://codecov.io/gh/Plume-org/Plume/commit/33a0c7dcd3c4377db338ed380ab33c88caeed4bf?src=pr&el=desc) will **decrease** coverage by `6.9%`. > The diff coverage is `100%`. ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #558 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 41.96% 35.05% -6.91% ========================================== Files 70 67 -3 Lines 8839 7825 -1014 Branches 0 1876 +1876 ========================================== - Hits 3709 2743 -966 + Misses 5130 4323 -807 - Partials 0 759 +759 ```
trinity-1686a hat vor 5 Jahren überprüft
trinity-1686a hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert
Ersteller
Besitzer

kinda related, I'd prefer to use an enum telling we should use sqlite or postgres, but there is no way to do conditional based on other things than boolean :/
And there is no way to select if we use a docker or not, just to select which one, so I run empty alpine when nothing is needed.
I feel like this new syntax is better than the previous, but it misses some core features to not feel hacky in many places

kinda related, I'd prefer to use an enum telling we should use sqlite or postgres, but there is no way to do conditional based on other things than boolean :/ And there is no way to select if we use a docker or not, just to select which one, so I run empty alpine when nothing is needed. I feel like this new syntax is better than the previous, but it misses some core features to not feel hacky in many places
igalic (Migriert von github.com) hat vor 5 Jahren überprüft
igalic (Migriert von github.com) hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen

😵

😵
@ -199,0 +92,4 @@
parameters:
package:
type: string
default: plume
igalic (Migriert von github.com) hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert

that seems excessive

that seems excessive
elegaanz (Migriert von github.com) hat vor 5 Jahren überprüft
@ -199,0 +92,4 @@
parameters:
package:
type: string
default: plume
elegaanz (Migriert von github.com) hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert

Yeah, but don't worry, this was an old version, now we only repeat it a few times:

for i in 36 4 2 1 1; do
   ...

where i is the number of threads of the command.

It is to avoid job failures because of OOM errors.

Yeah, but don't worry, this was an old version, now we only repeat it a few times: ```bash for i in 36 4 2 1 1; do ... ``` where `i` is the number of threads of the command. It is to avoid job failures because of OOM errors.
trinity-1686a hat vor 5 Jahren überprüft
@ -199,0 +92,4 @@
parameters:
package:
type: string
default: plume
trinity-1686a hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert
Ersteller
Besitzer

I think you're reviewing an older commit

I think you're reviewing an older commit
elegaanz (Migriert von github.com) hat die Änderungen vor 5 Jahren genehmigt
elegaanz (Migriert von github.com) hat einen Kommentar hinterlassen

Seems to work as expected (sorry for the long time, I didn't saw this was ready for review). Thank you!

Seems to work as expected (sorry for the long time, I didn't saw this was ready for review). Thank you!

Reviewer

Der Pull Request wurde als 918bda14ec gemergt.

Schritt 1:

Wechsle auf einen neuen Branch in deinem lokalen Repository und teste die Änderungen.
git checkout -b rework-ci master
git pull origin rework-ci

Schritt 2:

Führe die Änderungen zusammen und aktualisiere den Stand online auf Forgejo.
git checkout master
git merge --no-ff rework-ci
git push origin master
Anmelden, um an der Diskussion teilzunehmen.
Keine Reviewer
Kein Meilenstein
Niemand zuständig
2 Beteiligte
Nachrichten
Fällig am
Das Fälligkeitsdatum ist ungültig oder außerhalb des zulässigen Bereichs. Bitte verwende das Format „jjjj-mm-tt“.

Kein Fälligkeitsdatum gesetzt.

Abhängigkeiten

Keine Abhängigkeiten gesetzt.

Referenz: Plume/Plume#558
Laden…
Hier gibt es bis jetzt noch keinen Inhalt.